El Cajon, CA
Scattered clouds
Scattered clouds:
57.2 °F
 

http://lao.ca.gov/BallotAnaly

http://lao.ca.gov/BallotAnalysis/Proposition?number=50&year=2016

SCA 17 (Resolution Chapter 127, Statutes of 2014), Steinberg. Members of the Legislature: suspension.

A YES vote on this measure means: The State Constitution would be amended to require a two-thirds vote of the Senate or Assembly in order to suspend a state legislator. The Senate or Assembly could eliminate that legislator’s salary and benefits during the suspension.

A NO vote on this measure means: The Senate or Assembly could still suspend a legislator with a majority vote. The suspended legislator, however, would continue to receive a state salary and benefits.

Let me get this straight . .

Let me get this straight . . .

IF I vote against (NO) Proposition 50 does that indicate that punishments for legislators that are expelled would also include losing their pay and benefits?

As I understand my reading of Proposition this would only occur is I voted for (YES). Is this true?

Were the 3 Senators found guilty in 2014 paid when they were suspended?

Please answer as soon as possible if you want my vote.

Regards, Del Barrett

Post new comment

The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.
  • Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.

More information about formatting options

CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.